Legal Opinion

Juozapaitis's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 31, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

Following the previous opinion in this case, 335 Mass. 137, the case was further heard in the Superior Court. The result was a decree whereby it was ordered that the insurer pay the employee $5,975.48 “in accordance with the decisions of the Industrial Accident Board” and under G. L. c. 152, § 28, and attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses in the sum of $207 under c. 152, § 11A; and further that in accordance with G. L. c. 152, § 28, “the employer, the Estate of James McManmon, reimburse the insurer for all amounts paid hereunder, each heir, legatee, devisee or other beneficiary of said estate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Jones v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Rosenthal v. MaletzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Feeney v. FeeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Kirby v. KirbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boardman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Barbour v. Massachusetts Automobile Rating & Accident Prevention BureauMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API