Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Green

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1931No. 6 Div. 793PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The circuit court sustained the demurrers of the bank to the appellant’s petition, and it declined to plead further, and the petition was dismissed. This was a final decree, and is sufficient to support the appeal. Code 1923, § 6078; Thornton v. Highland Avenue & Belt Railroad Co., 94 Ala. 353, 10 So. 442.

The appellant predicates its claim to preferential payment over the creditors of the insolvent bank on the provisions of sections 3466 and 3468 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (sections 191 and 193 of U. S. Code Ann. title 31).

The section first above cited provides that, where…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Thornton v. Highland Avenue & Belt RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BramwellDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1923
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PorterDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Western Grain Company CasesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Florida Bank & Trust Co. of West Palm Beach v. Union Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  3. Osbourn v. Lo BueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Pritchett v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. American Surety Co. v. AmslerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API