Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Porter

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided December 27, 1924No. 828PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

In its setting the case is in many respects analogous to United States v. Oklahoma, 261 U. S. 253, 43 S. Ct. 295, 67 L. Ed. 638; Strain v. U. S. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (C. C. A.) 292 F. 698; Id., 264 U. S. 570, 44 S. Ct. 334, 68 L. Ed. 854, and Bramwell v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (C. C. A., 9th Cir.) 299 F. 705. That is to say:

On November 9, 1921, the Union State Bank at Nez Perce, Idaho, failed to open for business. On the morning of that day • the following telegram was sent to the state commissioner of finance at Boise: '

“Bank closed today by order of board…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Beaston v. Farmers' Bank of Del.Supreme Court of the United States · 1838
  4. Bienville Water Supply Co. v. MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Bienville Water Supply Co. v. MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. United States ex rel. Ray v. PorterDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1927
  4. Aaron W. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026
  5. Christopher V. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API