United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bramwell
District Court, D. Oregon
In Equity. Suit by the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company against Frank C. Bramwell, Superintendent of Banks of the State of Oregon. Decree for plaintiff. »
1Opinion of the Court
BEAN. District Judge,
[1] The laws of the United States provide that, where any person indebted to the United States is insolvent, the debt due it shall be first satisfied (R. S. § 3466 [Comp. St. § 6372]), - and that, where the principal in any bond given the United States is insolvent, a surety who pays the money due on the bond shall have like priority as the United States (R. S. § 3468 [Comp. St. § 6374]). With this law in force, the United States, through the superintendent of the Klamath Indian reservation, caused to be deposited from time to time in the First State & Savings Bank of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. Thurston County, Neb.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- United States v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- American Surety Co. v. Carbon Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Fidelity Etc. Co. v. State Bank of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Mothersead v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- State ex rel. Spillman v. First State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Shippee v. Commercial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.