Tharo Systems, Inc. v. Cab Produkttechnik GmbH & Co. Kg
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COOK, Circuit Judge.
After finding that Defendant cab Produkttechnik GmbH & Co. Kg (“cab”) breached its contract with Plaintiff Tharo Systems, Inc. (“Tharo”), a jury awarded over €6 million (Euros) in damages to Tharo. cab filed several post-judgment motions, seeking, among other things, judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, and remittitur. The magistrate judge 1 granted remittitur and reduced the damage award, which Tharo accepted, and also granted Tharo’s motion for prejudgment interest, cab now appeals asserting various grounds for reversal. With the exception of one issue that the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Hall v. Rag-O-Rama, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. Worthington Cylinders Wisconsin, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2010
- RECEIVER OF ASSETS OF MID-AMERICA v. CoffmanDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
- FAURECIA EXHAUST SYSTEMS, INC. v. WalkerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.