Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Alcorn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

Two actions are involved in this suit, by which the foreclosure of mechanics’ liens upon different properties is sought. The same questions of law are involved in both cases, and they will, therefore, be considered together, as °ne action-

Appellee is a subcontractor, who, on or about the 20th day of July, 1919, entered into an oral contract with the appellant Alcorn, who was the principal contractor, to furnish certain furnaces and place the same in three dwellings which were then being built by Alcorn upon, the property of the appellant Horning. After said oral contract was entered into, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metzler v. ThyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. J. H. Queal & Co. v. StradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Port Huron & Northwestern Railway Co. v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Lee Canfield Lumber Co. v. HeinbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hammaker v. SchleighCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  2. Moffitt Building Material Co. v. U. S. Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Hanrahan v. Martinson Construction Co. (In re Walterman Implement, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API