J. H. Queal & Co. v. Stradley
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pollc District Gourt. — Hon. O. A. Bishop, Judge. Action by the plaintiffs and the cross petitioners Oarr, Adams & Oo. and Garver & Oo. to foreclose mechanics’ liens against the property of the defendants Danner. The defendants Danner in a cross bill sue the defendant Stradley and his sureties, Campbell and Locke, on a bond given for the faithful performance of his building contract with the Danners.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Pollc District Gourt. — Hon. O. A. Bishop, Judge. Action by the plaintiffs and the cross petitioners Oarr, Adams & Oo. and Garver & Oo. to foreclose mechanics’ liens against the property of the defendants Danner. The defendants Danner in a cross bill sue the defendant Stradley and his sureties, Campbell and Locke, on a bond given for the faithful performance of his building contract with the Danners. There was a judgment for the plaintiffs, and for the cross petitioners Oarr, Adams & Oo. and J. A. Garver & Oo., and for the sureties Locke and Campbell, from which the defendants…
1Opinion of the Court
Sherwin, J. —
1 The only objections made to the claim of the plaintiffs Queal & Go. are that the statement tiled for a mechanic’s lien does not specify in all instances the quality of the material furnished or give the price of each item thereof. In disposing of this question it is well to have in mind the requirements of the statute under which the statement was filed. It provides that a verified statement of the demand due him, after allowing, all credits, setting forth the time when such material was. furnished or labor performed and when completed, and containing a correct description of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grace v. NesbittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Simonson v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Stubbs v. Clarinda, College Springs & South-Western R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Cowdery v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Green Bay Lumber Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Getchell & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Peterson & SampsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Page v. GrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Doyle v. FaustMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Chicago Lumber & Coal Co. v. GarmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Rowe v. StufflebeamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.