Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Coffman, Unpublished Decision (12-29-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1999No. Case No. 99CAA09044Unpublished

1Dissent

Respectfully, I dissent. The majority finds ". . . based on previous decisions of this court, that the trial court's decision denying appellant's motion for shock probation is not a final appealable order. This Court has previously held that the denial of a motion for shock probation is not a final appealable order." (Majority Opinion at 3, citations omitted). A review of our previous decisions reveals this Court's position on this issue has been inconsistent at best. In State v. Mackey (May 6, 1981), Stark App. No. 5516, unreported, the defendant appealed the denial of his motion for shock…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. LorraineOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. DelaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. BrandonOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API