Legal Opinion

State v. Delaney

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1983No. 45205PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaRKUS, J.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for shock probation, claiming the trial court erred by failing to rule on that motion more expeditiously. We find defendant’s contention lacks merit, so we affirm.

Defendant was charged with rape and felonious assault. Prior to trial, he pled guilty to the lesser included offense of aggravated assault. He was sentenced to two to five years in the state correctional system, and he entered the penitentiary on July 16,1981. He filed a motion to suspend further execution of sentence on August 28, 1981. The trial court denied that motion on January 8,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dallman v. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. State v. PoffenbaughOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State v. OrrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. State, Ex Rel. Corrigan v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. EllingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. CoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. BrandonOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. HatfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API