Legal Opinion
State v. Lorraine
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1993No. 90-1927PublishedCited by 196 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
A
1
Appellant alleges in his first proposition of law that the trial court applied an incorrect standard of mitigation as to his capacity to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.
Appellant failed to raise this issue in the court below and, as such, he has waived the alleged error. State v. Moreland (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 58, 552 N.E.2d 894; State v. Broom (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 277, 533 N.E.2d 682. Nevertheless, we examine the merits of appellant’s allegations, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires review of this issue. Appellant alleges that the trial court used the insanity standard in its…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by196 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
191 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.