Legal Opinion

State v. James Cudd

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2014No. DA 13-0141PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 James Bradley Cudd, Sr., (Cudd) appeals from his conviction in the Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Big Horn County, for committing the offense of Sexual Intercourse without Consent in violation of § 45-5-503, MCA. We affirm and restate Cudd’s sole issue on appeal as follows:

¶2 Did the District Court abuse its discretion by denying Cudd’s challenge for cause of a juror whose daughter had been the victim of sexual violence?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 The State charged Cudd with Sexual Intercourse without Consent, alleging that Cudd engaged in a continual sexual relationship…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GoodMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. Richard CrosleyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. GolieMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. JayMontana Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. C. RussellMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. E. GhostbearMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. T. MoralesMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. S. CalahanMontana Supreme Court · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API