Legal Opinion

Newhall v. McGill

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1949No. 5069PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCINI, Justice.

Mary McGill Luke died in January, 1939, leaving a witnessed will dated August 4, 1928, which appointed her sister, Sarah C. McGill, executrix. Her will was admitted to probate February 8, 1945, in Maricopa County, Cause No. 19135. She left fifteen heirs. Sarah C. McGill was the sole devisee. Helen Newhall, another sister residing in Chicago, died in that city in 1944. The latter left a will bequeathing one-sixth of her estate to each of plaintiffs in this action, appellants herein, viz.: Franklin D. Newhall and Agnes Newhall, who bring this action as heirs. Franklin L>.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Marti v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Land v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. McNutt v. GerckeArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Fields v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Homberger v. WilleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Shedd v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  2. Doss v. KalasArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. In Re Estate of DaleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children v. GardinerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API