Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Brown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1914PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. George Jepson, Judge. Action to restrain the defendant from trespassing on plaintiff’s land, and to ascertain and fix the true boundary line between the two parties. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

On the 13th day of October, 1899, the plaintiff purchased and still owns a piece of land which is described as follows: The south forty feet of lot 1, in block 9, in Higman’s addition to Sioux City. It appears that immediately after the purchase he took possession, had the same surveyed, and boundary lines pointed out; that thereafter he constructed a dwelling house on the portion of the lot so purchased, sowed the same to blue grass, and planted thereon certain trees; that this portion of lot 1 faced on Pierce street, which runs north and south; that the lot was on the west side of Pierce…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Grube v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Keller v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Scott v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shaw v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Tewes v. Pine Lane Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. Carstensen v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  4. O'Dell v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Patrick v. CheneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API