Valley Lumber Co. v. Struck
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a motion to set aside the judgment and render another judgment. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to foreclose certain liens of plaintiff and his assignors under the Mechanics’ Lien Law. Judgment was for plaintiff; and defendants appeal from the judgment, and also from an order denying their motion to set aside the judgment and render another judgment, etc.
Respondent contends that the appeal should be dismissed because the notice of appeal was not served upon one F. A. Duncan. It appears that said Duncan had also instituted an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against the same property involved in the action of the plaintiff herein; and that the two actions had been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Loup v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Newport Wharf & Lumber Co. v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Blethen v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- McLaughlin v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burnett v. PiercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Collins v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bell v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- In Re SalazarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hall v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.