State ex rel. Davis v. Cox
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original proceeding in quo warranto to determine the right of respondents to hold office as members of a hoard of education.
1Opinion of the CourtFlansbtjbg, J.
Action in quo warranto, commenced in this court, to try the right of the members of the board of education of Consolidated School District No. 2 of Harlan county to hold office. The school district referred to and offices now held by respondents were created under and by virtue of chapter 243, Laws 1919. Relator contends that this act is unconstitutional.
The first objection'made is that the bill was amended in one house of the legislature, that these amendments were not concurred in by the other house, and that, therefore, the two branches of the legislature did not pass the bill in the same…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Robinson v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Cleland v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- State ex rel. Baughn v. UreNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
- State ex rel. Ayres v. AmsberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
- Webster v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carlton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- State ex rel. City of Omaha v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Commercial Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Pyramid Realty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. Tanner v. WarrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Hurd v. Sanitary Sewer DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.