Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Sanitary Sewer District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1922No. 22532PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Redick, District Judge.

Proceedings were instituted by the mayor and city council of the city of Harvard under the provisions of chapter 189, Laws 1919 (Comp. St. 1922, secs. 4337-4350), for the purpose of providing a sanitary sewer system for such city; the system has been constructed, and the present proceeding involves the validity of the special assessments levied to pay for the same.

There being no natural outlet for sewage, it was necessary to provide a disposal plant; the project, therefore, involved the construction of main sewers, district and laterals, and a disposal plant. The cost…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Morse v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Ayres v. AmsberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  4. City of Chicago v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People ex rel. Secretary of State v. State InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Michelson v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hinman v. TempleNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Weilage v. City of CreteNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Besack v. City of BeatriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Belza v. Village of EmersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API