United States v. Ammons
District Court, N.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CARSWELL, Chief Judge.
United States brought suit against defendants, Ammons and Bennett, alleging :(1) That Bennett was injured due to the negligence of Ammons.(2) That Bennett was the recipient of medical care at the expense of the Government.(3) That Bennett signed an instrument purporting to release Ammons from all liability arising out of the accident.(4) That no part of the monies paid Bennett by Ammons for the release has been paid to the Government in reimbursement for medical care furnished. Basically, it is the contention of the United States that the Medical Care Recovery Act, 76…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. James F. Merrigan and James F. Merrigan, Jr., and Third-Party v. Thomas J. McKinney Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- United States v. GreeneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- United States v. Fort Benning Rifle and Pistol ClubCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1967
- United States v. WittrockDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.