Legal Opinion

United States v. Wittrock

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1967No. Civ. A. 41452PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (Document 5)

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This is an action brought under the Medical Care Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2651-2653 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), by the United States to recover medical expenses provided by the United States for a dependent member of the Armed Forces, due to injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendant.

42 U.S.C. § 2651 provides:

“(a) In any case in which the United States is authorized or required by law to furnish hospital, medical, surgical, or dental care and treatment * *…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. AmmonsDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1965
  3. United States v. GuinnDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
  4. Phillips v. TrameDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. California-Pacific Utilities Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  2. United States v. James F. Merrigan and James F. Merrigan, Jr., and Third-Party v. Thomas J. McKinney Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. Tom York, D/B/A York's Mobil Service, and John HareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton, a Public Body Politic and CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. WinterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API