Legal Opinion
United States v. Jones
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 17, 1967No. Civ. A. 1166, 1167 (Newport News), 5758 (Norfolk)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge.
These three actions involve substantially similar legal issues and are thus discussed in a joint memorandum. They pertain essentially to the constitutionality of the Medical Care Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2651-2653.
In Nos. 1166 and 1167, the United States seeks to recover the fair and reasonable value of hospitalization, care and treatment furnished to Enrique B. Bor-rego (No. 1166) and Amoldo Valdemar (No. 1167), each members of the United States Army, who were allegedly injured on March 20, 1965, when a vehicle op erated by Harrison M. Jones…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Richard R. Rayfield v. Forrest LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Pfeiffer Brewing Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Tom York, D/B/A York's Mobil Service, and John HareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Fort Benning Rifle and Pistol ClubCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. WinterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- United States v. NationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1969
- United States v. TheriaqueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.