Legal Opinion
United States v. Billy W. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1995No. 93-5130PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING EN BANC
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Billy W. Hill appeals his sentence imposed by the district court pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). A panel of this court reversed Defendant’s sentence holding that the government had failed to prove that one of his prior convictions constituted a violent felony for purposes of enhancement under the ACCA. See United States v. Hill, 36 F.3d 978 (10th Cir.1994). We sua sponte ordered en banc consideration of this case in order to resolve an apparent conflict between our decision in Hill and prior…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Robert Paul KaplanskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Donnie Roy O'NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Horace Henry MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard BONAT, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Bruce Derek Spring AKA Bruce Derek WallsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. James Manuel RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Hill, William D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.