Legal Opinion

United States v. James Manuel Romero

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1997No. 96-2078PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Defendant James Manuel Romero appeals his conviction and sentence resulting from his participation in a carjacking and robbery. On appeal, Romero contends that: (1) the government presented insufficient evidence that he intended to cause death or serious bodily harm as required by the federal carjacking statute; (2) the prosecutor’s closing arguments and the jury instructions improperly informed the jury that they could convict Romero of carjacking based on conditional intent; (3) Congress exceeded its power under the Commerce Clause in enacting the federal carjacking…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Kevin Bishop, United States of America v. Edward StokesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Holloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. United States v. Wilson, Ralph T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Michael Shane Phipps and Dean Rayburn GilleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Coyette Deon JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API