United States v. James Manuel Romero
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Defendant James Manuel Romero appeals his conviction and sentence resulting from his participation in a carjacking and robbery. On appeal, Romero contends that: (1) the government presented insufficient evidence that he intended to cause death or serious bodily harm as required by the federal carjacking statute; (2) the prosecutor’s closing arguments and the jury instructions improperly informed the jury that they could convict Romero of carjacking based on conditional intent; (3) Congress exceeded its power under the Commerce Clause in enacting the federal carjacking…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Kevin Bishop, United States of America v. Edward StokesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Holloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- United States v. Wilson, Ralph T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Michael Shane Phipps and Dean Rayburn GilleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Coyette Deon JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.