Legal Opinion
Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. Boston Communications Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 1, 2005No. CIV.A.00-12234-EFHPublished
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this patent infringement case, Plaintiff Freedom Wireless, Inc. (“Freedom”) alleged that Defendants Boston Communications Group, Inc. (“Boston Communications Group”), Cingular Wireless LLC, AT & T Wireless PCS, CMT Partners, and Western Wireless Corp. (collectively, the “carrier Defendants”) infringed United States Patent Nos. 5,722,067 (’067 patent) and 6,157,823 (’823 patent), which relate to a prepaid cellular system.
Following a fifty-one day trial on the issues of infringement and invalidity, the jury…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Environmental Designs, Ltd. And the Trentham Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California and Ralph M. Parsons Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Chemque, Inc. (Formerly Known as Chemque Canada, Ltd.) and Thomas & Betts Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.