Harrington v. Pulte Home Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 This case requires us to determine when an arbitration clause in a contract of adhesion may be enforced. The trial court refused to enforce the clause here. Because we find that the arbitration clause in this case was neither contrary to appellees’ reasonable expectations nor substantively unconscionable, we reverse.
Facts and Procedural Background
¶2 Appellees, and the class of claimants they seek to represent, each purchased a home from appellants Pulte Home Corporation or Del Webb Communities, Incorporated. The homes were purchased through sales agents: appellants…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Clark v. Renaissance West, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Coup v. Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Paduano v. Express Scripts, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.