Polyone Corp. v. Kutka
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
DONALD C. NUGENT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. The Report and Recommendation (ECF #90), submitted on October 31, 2014, recommends that Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF #21) be granted in part as agreed to by Defendant Kutka except for the demand that Mr. Kutka by enjoined from continuing his employment at PolyMax. Magistrate Judge Baughman found that Plaintiff did not establish a strong case with clear and convincing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Massey v. City of FerndaleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Southern Milk Sales, Inc. v. Don Martin, T.C. Jacoby & Company, Inc., and Northshore Milk Producers AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jacobs v. Securitas Electronic Security, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- Millennium Health, LLC v. RobertsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020