Legal Opinion

State v. Chul Yun Kim

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1986No. 783A85PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant, Chul Yun Kim, has presented six assignments of error on appeal. He contends inter alia that the trial court erred by allowing the State to ask the victim a leading question during direct examination. He also asserts that it was error for the trial court to allow a police investigator to give corroborative testimony which went beyond the victim’s testimony at trial. The defendant further contends that it was error to permit an expert witness to testify about the truthfulness of the victim during her evaluation and treatment resulting from the crimes charged. He…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony Damian AzureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Buddy Joe BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. McGradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API