Wootton v. State

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

In this case, we must decide whether the evidence is legally and factually sufficient to support appellant Barry Wayne Woot-ton’s conviction for possession of anhydrous ammonia with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine under section 481.124 of the Texas Controlled Substances Act. This appears to be the first case to address the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction under this recently enacted statute. We hold the evidence is sufficient, overrule appellant’s additional issue regarding the admission of prior convictions, and affirm the trial…