Legal Opinion

Studebaker v. Salina Waterworks Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 3, 1912No. 1,217PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. Suit by W. G. Studebaker against the Salina Waterworks Company, removed into the Circuit Court for the First division of the district of Kansas, by operation of law into the District Court, and heard on motion to remand to state court.

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

This suit was brought by complainant in the state court to secure injunctive relief against defendant, restraining it from cutting off his water service threatened by defendant because of complainant’s refusal to pay for metered water service furnished him by defendant company under its rules and regulations in force in the transaction of its business affairs. Defendant has removed the case into this court. Complainant moves to remand.

The requisite diversity of citizenship exists between the parties to confer jurisdiction on this court. The ground of the motion to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hunt v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. KutemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1892
  3. Larabee v. DolleyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1909
  4. Amelia Milling Co. v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1903
  5. South Dakota Cent. Ry. Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Empire Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Seber v. Spring Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Dow Corning Corp. v. SchpakDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  4. Lever Bros. v. J. Eavenson & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
  5. Crockett v. OverfieldDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API