Legal Opinion
Lever Bros. v. J. Eavenson & Sons, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 14, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The motion to remand is granted.
I. The plaintiff contends that the case was removed after the defendant’s time to answer had expired.
(A) The facts are that the action was brought by service of the summons and complaint on the defendant R. C. Williams So Co., Inc., on March 24, 1934, and on the defendant J. Eavenson So Sons, Inc., on March 26, 1934.
On April 12, 1934, the defendant J. Ea-venson -So Sons, Inc., in pursuance of notice-given the day previous, presented to the state court its petition for removal of this action to this court on the ground that its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Geer v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Chi., RI & Pac. Ry. v. DowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. DowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hay v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- JH Smith Co. v. Jordan Marsh CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
- Crockett v. OverfieldDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1938
- Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Comet Import Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Ross v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1937
- Dienstag v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.