Ewing v. Bay Minette Land Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, Justice
(after stating the facts.)
The appellant insists that the facts alleged sustain the equity of the bill, as one to prevent an unwarranted abuse of the power of sale in violation of the trust arising therefrom, by sacrificing the mortgaged property at a mass sale, instead of selling in separate parcels. A sufficient answer to this contention is, that the bill does not aver that the mortgagee is threatening or intends to sell the property en masse, or that the mortgagee has been requested to sell the property in separate parcels or tracts and has refused such request. It is not averred that by a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Mahone v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863
- Dozier v. FarriorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- White v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Glover v. HembreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- J. H. Morris, Inc. v. Indian Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Lee v. MacOn County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Badham v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Badham v. BadhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Criddle v. C.I.T. Financial Services (In Re Hubbard)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.