Legal Opinion

Hollon v. Clary

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2004No. 2003-2079PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

*527{¶ 1} Appellee, William Hollon, claims an entitlement to uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UM/UIM”) insurance coverage under a policy of insurance with appellant, Twin City Fire Insurance Company (“Twin City”), his employer’s liability insurer. Twin City denied Hollon’s claim, alleging that American Ambulette and Ambulance Service, Inc. (“American”), Hollon’s employer, had expressly rejected UM/UIM coverage. Hollon, however, asserts that American’s rejection was ineffective because Twin City’s written offer of UM/UIM coverage did not set forth the premiums for the coverage, as required by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gyori v. Johnston Coca-Cola Bottling Group, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Linko v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gilchrist v. Gonsor, 88609 (8-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Roush v. ButeraOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Arn v. McLeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Houston v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (8-12-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Byer v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API