Legal Opinion

Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 2002No. 2001-1709PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The following questions have been certified to us by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII:

{¶ 2} “(1) Are the requirements of Linko v. Indemnity Ins. Co. [2000], 90 Ohio St.3d [445, 739 N.E.2d 338], relative to an offer of UM/UIM coverage, applicable to a policy of insurance written after enactment of [1997] HB 261 and before [2001] SB 97?

{¶ 3} “(2) If the Linko requirements are applicable, does, under [1997] HB 261, a signed rejection act as an effective declination of UM/UIM coverage, where there is no…

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Gilchrist v. Gonsor, 88609 (8-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Hollon v. ClaryOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Arn v. McLeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Houston v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (8-12-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API