Daniels v. McDaniels
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court. — How. A. D. Burnes, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.
Plaintiff bored a well for defendant for which the* latter refused to pay, whereupon this action was instituted by 'filing a petition in two counts; the first on a specific contract for the work under certain conditions and for a certain price and the second on a quantum meruit. The judgment in the trial court was for the plaintiff on the latter count.
There was evidence in plaintiff’s behalf that he made a contract with defendant’s father for boring a well on defendant’s farm and at the same time contracted with the father for boring a well on the latter’s farm nearby: There was evidence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Mansur v. BottsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Henderson & Jones v. MaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
- Cozad v. ElamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Avil Printing Co. v. Fred P. Kaiser Publishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hoyt v. BuderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Dey v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1919