Legal Opinion

Dey v. Hill

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1919No. Civil No. 1707PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Pima. S. L. Pattee, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Appellee, who is a practicing attorney in the courts of the state, sued for professional services rendered appellant between January 19, 1917, and March 23, 1918, alleging their reasonable value to be $7,000, of which he had been paid $4,000, leaving a balance due him of $3,000. The appellant’s answer admits the services were rendered him as alleged, but denies they were of the reasonable value of $7,000 or of any value in excess of $4,000, and denies any indebtedness whatever. The case was tried before the court and a jury, and a verdict and judgment for the full amount demanded was the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arizona-Parral Mining Co. v. ForbesArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Copper State Mining Co. v. KidderArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Owen v. HadleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Daniels v. McDanielsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J. H. Mulrein Plumbing Supply Co. v. WalshArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Ellison v. SchusterArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Packard Phoenix Motor Co. v. McRuerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Merchants & Stock Growers Bank v. MarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API