Dey v. Hill
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Pima. S. L. Pattee, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
Appellee, who is a practicing attorney in the courts of the state, sued for professional services rendered appellant between January 19, 1917, and March 23, 1918, alleging their reasonable value to be $7,000, of which he had been paid $4,000, leaving a balance due him of $3,000. The appellant’s answer admits the services were rendered him as alleged, but denies they were of the reasonable value of $7,000 or of any value in excess of $4,000, and denies any indebtedness whatever. The case was tried before the court and a jury, and a verdict and judgment for the full amount demanded was the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arizona-Parral Mining Co. v. ForbesArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Copper State Mining Co. v. KidderArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Owen v. HadleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Daniels v. McDanielsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- J. H. Mulrein Plumbing Supply Co. v. WalshArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Ellison v. SchusterArizona Supreme Court · 1929
- Packard Phoenix Motor Co. v. McRuerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Merchants & Stock Growers Bank v. MarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1928