Legal Opinion

Whipple v. City of South Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The judgments under review were based upon the court’s adjudication that the plaintiffs’ method of doing business by delivering their respective products along established routes to their established or regular customers, pursuant to pre-existing arrangements with such customers, was not hawking or peddling and was not prohibited by that ordinance. In section 2 thereof, the words “hawkers” and “peddlers,” as used therein, were defined as including “all individuals, whether principals or agents or employees, who go about the city from place to place transporting goods, wares, or merchandise…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. BrickellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Commonwealth v. HanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. State v. WhitcomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weco Products Co. v. Reed Drug Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State ex rel. Ford Hopkins Co. v. Mayor of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Brennan v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Myers v. City of DefianceOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. City of Washburn v. EllquistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API