Legal Opinion

Michaels v. Cooper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in awarding statutory costs to defendant in the absence of proof that it “would not be equitable, under all of the circumstances” (CPLR 8101; see, Olmstead v Federated Dept. Stores, 208 AD2d 979, 982, lv denied 85 NY2d 811; cf., Govern & McDowell v McDowell & Walker, 75 AD2d 979, 980). Although neither party recovered from the other, defendant is considered the prevailing party and is entitled to costs (see, Graybill v Van Dyne, 67 Misc 2d 228; 14 Weinstein-KornMiller, NY Civ Prac jj…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. McDowell v. McDowell & Walker, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Graybill v. Van DyneNew York Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samoroukov v. KamenevAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API