Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1928No. 5276PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit to recover a penalty for hauling and using a defective railroad ear, in violation of the Safety Appliance Act, as amended by section 4 of the Act of April 14, 1910, U. S. C. tit. 45, § 13 (45 USCA § 13).

Section 2 of the quoted act (45 USCA § 11) makes it unlawful for any common carrier subject to its provisions to haul or use any car not equipped with safety appliances. Section 4, which imposes a penalty for each and every violation, contains the following proviso:

“Provided, that where any car shall have been properly equipped, as provided in this act and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. Trinity & B. V. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
  3. Southern Pac. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. United States v. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. United States v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API