St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit to recover a penalty for hauling and using a defective railroad ear, in violation of the Safety Appliance Act, as amended by section 4 of the Act of April 14, 1910, U. S. C. tit. 45, § 13 (45 USCA § 13).
Section 2 of the quoted act (45 USCA § 11) makes it unlawful for any common carrier subject to its provisions to haul or use any car not equipped with safety appliances. Section 4, which imposes a penalty for each and every violation, contains the following proviso:
“Provided, that where any car shall have been properly equipped, as provided in this act and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. Trinity & B. V. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
- Southern Pac. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1937