Legal Opinion

United States v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 14, 1937No. 829Published

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES C. WILSON, District Judge.

In this action to recover penalties under the Safety Appliance Act, the defendant has pleaded guilty to the first count .in the plaintiff’s petition. In the second count of the plaintiff’s petition the allegations are:

“Defendant, on November 12, 1932, operated on its line of railroad, over a part of a highway of interstate commerce, one train, to wit: Its own No. 41, consisting of forty-one cars, drawn by its own locomotive engine No. 1057, all of said cars being equipped with power or train brakes, not less than 85 per cent thereof, to wit: forty cars, having…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. New York Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. Trinity & B. V. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
  5. United States v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API