Southern Pac. Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, District Judge.
This action was brought by the United States against the Southern Pacific Company in the District Court of the United States for the District of New Mexico, under the act of Congress known as the Safety Appliance Act, approved March 2, 1893, as amended by the acts approved April 1, 1896, March 2, 1903, and April 14, 1910 (45 USCA § 1 et seq.; Comp. St. § 8605 et seq.), to recover the penalty therein provided. Briefly stated, the violation complained of is that the defendant is a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce by railroad in the state of New Mexico, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
- United States v. Trinity & B. V. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1973
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
- City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961