Legal Opinion
United States v. Polar Star Alaska Housing Corp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 14, 2012No. 09-35990PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
At the end of a twenty-year lease program in which Polar Star Alaska Housing Corp. (“Polar Star”) owned 300 units of family housing located on Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, and leased them back to the Air Force, Polar Star and the United States could not agree on the purchase price of the houses. They similarly could not agree on the amount of rent payable for an additional year of the lease. The United States first sent notice of a one-year renewal of the lease, then filed a protective eminent domain action to condemn a five-month leasehold in the houses. The district court ruled…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Robert v. Baer v. David Chase Chase Films Inc., a Delaware Corporation John Does A-ZCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. 93.970 Acres of LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- North Star Alaska, North Star Borough, Intervenor-Appellee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 76 Acres, More or Less, in Baltimore & Harford CountiesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. 32.42 Acres of Land, More or Less, Located in San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012