Legal Opinion
North Star Alaska, North Star Borough, Intervenor-Appellee v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 18, 1994No. 92-35082PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
The November 23, 1993 opinion of the court, sitting en banc, concluded:
We remand to the panel to determine whether North Star’s claim is contractually or statutorily based, and any other issues presented by this appeal.
North Star Alaska v. United States, 9 F.3d 1430, 1433 (9th Cir.1993) (en banc). Accordingly, we must determine whether North Star’s claim is contractually or statutorily based. Because we conclude that North Star’s claim for reformation is concerned solely with contractual rights, we affirm.
I
If a plaintiff’s claim is “concerned solely with rights created…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Megapulse, Inc. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Transohio Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Marshall Leasing, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- V S Limited Partnership, an Arkansas Limited Partnership v. Department of Housing and Urban Development United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Native Village of Noatak v. Edgar Blatchford, as Commissioner, Department of Community and Regional Affairs, State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Janicki Logging Co. v. Bruce Mateer Dale RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Presidential Gardens Associates v. United States ex rel. Secretary of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.