Legal Opinion
Golden Rule Insurance v. Atallah
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 23, 1995No. 20-1044PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Golden Rule Insurance Company (“Golden Rule”), an Illinois corporation, appeals a judgment awarding defendant-appellee Catherine Atallah (“Atallah”) $263,698.68 for medical expenses pursuant to an insurance contract (“the Policy”) between the parties. Golden Rule contends that Atal-lah’s illness, a meningioma, or tumor of the brain lining, was a preexisting condition excluded from coverage under the Policy and therefore the district court erred in not granting Golden Rule judgment as a matter of law. We agree that Golden Rule was entitled to judgment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wagenmann v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Jose L. Sanchez v. Puerto Rico Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Franco Acevedo-Diaz v. Jose E. Aponte, Ada N. Perez, Franco Acevedo-Diaz v. Jose E. Aponte, Dorotea Collazo RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Peerless Insurance Co. v. BrennonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Richard Jacques v. Clean-Up Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Glista v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Crowe v. BolducCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Santos v. Sunrise Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Star Financial Services, Inc. v. AASTAR Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.