Marino v. Ragen
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurrence
Mr. Justice Rutledge,
with whom Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Murphy join,
concurring.
This case sharply points up a much larger problem, of growing concern to this Court, than merely the disposition to be made of Marino’s petition in view of the state’s confession of error. I agree that relief is due him, and I join in the Court’s opinion. But I do not find his case different, except in one respect, from many others which have come regularly to this Court from Illinois in recent years, in which relief has been as regularly denied. The only substantial difference, in my judgment, is that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- White v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.