Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 12, 1925No. 4650PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCAMANT, Circuit Judge.

Prior to April 10, 1920, the property in dispute belonged to Charles Rury. On that day he executed conveyances in favor of appellant. On the 9th of December, 1920, Rury filed his voluntary petition in bankruptcy and was adjudged a bankrupt. Appellee was appointed trustee in bankruptcy, and brought suit in the superior court for Benton county on the 12th of January, 1921, to set aside the conveyances from Rury to appellant. Appellant answered, the questions at issue were tried out, and on the 1st of November, 1922, a decree was entered, setting aside these deeds and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Traders' National Bank v. SchorrWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Olson v. Title Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Brandon v. LeavenworthWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Thompson v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Cunningham v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knoell v. Frisco Lease, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. Cunningham v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. Seazengers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Slazengers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API