Legal Opinion
Knoell v. Frisco Lease, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 14, 1935No. 1096PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit to quiet title brought by Valentine G. Knoell, Katherine Knoell and W. H. Ivy against the Frisco Lease, Incorporated, the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company (hereinafter called the Railway Company), and others.
The trial court sustained defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended and supplemental bill. Plaintiffs elected not to further plead, and a decree of dismissal was entered.
The facts, as set forth in the amended and supplemental petition, are these: The S. E. % of Sec. 3, Twp. 11 N., R. 3 W. of Indian Meridian, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Dick v. ForakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Severns Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Marland v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Gilbert v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pearce v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Bailey v. BanisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Williams v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.