Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Washington National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1912No. 10076PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Kauffman, J., entered May 2, 1911, in favor of the plaintiff, upon agreed facts, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The material facts in this case are as follows: On February £3, 1909, the respondent, plaintiff- below, contracted with appellant to furnish the tiling and lay a tile floor in the appellant’s bank building, at Ellensburg, Washington, for an agreed consideration of $££9.95. On March £, 1909, the respondent claimed that the work was completed, but the appellant, claiming that the work was not performed in accordance with the contract, refused to pay for it. The respondent thereafter, on May £6, 1909, filed his claim of lien for the full amount of the contract price, and on June £9, 1909,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. JoslinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Olson v. Title Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Edison General Electric Co. v. Canadian Pacific Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Schmidt v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Mortimer v. DirksWashington Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Perlus v. SilverWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bodeneck v. Cater's Motor Freight System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Harvey Coal Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  4. Johnson v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Ripley v. StorerNew York Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API