Legal Opinion

Sabatini v. Corning-Painted Post Area School District

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 26, 2001No. 6:99-cv-06550PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, Chief Judge.

On December 29, 1999, this court issued a Decision and Order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in this action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., directing defendant, Corning-Painted Post Area School District (“the District”), to provide plaintiff Aaron Sabatini (“Aaron”) with a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”), as required by IDEA. Sabatini v. Corning-Painted, Post Area Sch Dist., 78 F.Supp.2d 138 (W.D.N.Y.1999). The parties subsequently entered into a settlement…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Albert Farbotko v. Clinton County Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Frank v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
  3. Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Farbotko v. Clinton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Kahlil v. Original Old Homestead Restaurant, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API