Legal Opinion
Polymer Technology Corp. v. Mimran
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 11, 1992No. 1375, Docket 92-7177PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RESTANI, Judge:
This action involves claims for trademark infringement, trademark counterfeiting, false designation of origin, fraud and unfair competition under the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127 (1988) (“Lanham Act”) and New York state law. The district court denied plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, and indicated its intent to award defendants damages from the injunction bond. We reverse and remand for further findings.
Plaintiff, Polymer Technology Corporation (“Polymer”) manufactures and sells ophthalmic products, including solutions for the care of contact…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- The Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- American Footwear Corporation v. General Footwear Company Limited, and Universal City Studios, Inc., Intervening-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Town of Hyde ParkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Blum v. SchlegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Blum v. SchlegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Ryan v. Volpone Stamp Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Polymer Technology Corp. v. MimranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.