State v. Peña
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Defendant was convicted of first-degree burglary and third-degree assault. On appeal, he argues that the trial court should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal on the burglary charge because he could not have committed a burglary in his own home. We agree and reverse the judgment in part.
Because this appeal arises from the denial of defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal, we set out the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Goddard, 178 Or App 538, 541, 37 P3d 1046, rev den 334 Or 121 (2002). Defendant and three other people leased a house together.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. FeltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. RohrbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. MacOnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017