Legal Opinion

State v. Lopez

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 2017No. A16-0947PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RODENBERG, Judge

Appellant was convicted of theft and first-degree burglary after he entered a motel room and took a cellular phone and wallet. He was staying in a different room in the motel that evening, and argues that he did not enter a “building” without consent, and that he is therefore not guilty of first-degree burglary. Because we hold that a motel room constitutes a structure suitable for providing shelter to human beings, and is therefore a “building” under the statutory definition, we affirm,1

FACTS

On November 21, 2015, Z.D. and a coworker rented a motel room at a motel in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Wesolic v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LopezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API