State v. Lopez
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODENBERG, Judge
Appellant was convicted of theft and first-degree burglary after he entered a motel room and took a cellular phone and wallet. He was staying in a different room in the motel that evening, and argues that he did not enter a “building” without consent, and that he is therefore not guilty of first-degree burglary. Because we hold that a motel room constitutes a structure suitable for providing shelter to human beings, and is therefore a “building” under the statutory definition, we affirm,1
FACTS
On November 21, 2015, Z.D. and a coworker rented a motel room at a motel in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Wesolic v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018