Legal Opinion

State v. MacOn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 11, 2012No. CR0300695; A142646PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for burglary in the second degree, ORS 164.215, based on his theft of a lockbox containing checks, receipts, and cash from a toy store storage room. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, asserting that the state failed to prove that defendant entered or remained unlawfully in a building within the meaning of ORS 164.205. We affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Defendant entered a store called Toy Bliss during business hours, where he was greeted by a store manager, Boston. Boston asked…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. KurtzOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. CockeOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. State v. EssigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HolsclawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. State v. Perez-SalasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API